Which statement defines contempt of court?

• A. Conduct that obstructs the proper administration of justice
• B. Disobeying a court order in a manner that harms others
• C. A minor delay in responding to a subpoena
• D. Contempt only applies in criminal cases

Answer: (B)

Contempt of court is about actions that show a willful disregard for the court’s authority and the orderly administration of justice. Disobeying a court order in a manner that harms others fits this idea because it combines two essential elements: the explicit command of the court and the disruptive, harmful effect of ignoring it. When someone willfully violates an order and that violation causes harm or undermines the rights or safety of others, the court has a clear reason to sanction the behavior as contempt. This focus on deliberate disobedience that yields a harmful impact is what contempt seeks to deter and remedy. Contempt can arise in civil or criminal contexts and also includes conduct that obstructs the proceedings, not just outright disobedience; however, showing that the disobedience harms others makes the action particularly characteristic of contempt.